Struggling to find the right talent?

Start building a world-class MSP team! Browse top-tier, pre-vetted, dedicated technicians from a global talent pool. Cover all time zones and keep your MSP clients happy 24/7. See the candidates on video first and only interview the ones you really like.

FIND YOUR BEST TECHNICIAN
Video screening candidates

Screening candidates by video has become one of the sharpest filters MSPs can add to their hiring process. Before a single interview slot gets booked, a two-minute intro video tells you more about a candidate’s communication style, technical fluency, and client-facing presence than a resume ever could. For an industry where remote support techs represent your brand on every call, that early read matters.

The idea is simple. Ask candidates to record a short video answering a few targeted prompts, then review the submissions before scheduling live conversations. You see the difference immediately: some candidates explain a technical concept with clarity and confidence, others stumble through basic articulation. That gap tells you who’s worth your time.

This approach saves hours of interview scheduling and weeds out candidates who look strong on paper but fall short when they have to actually talk through a problem. The rest of this piece breaks down how to structure the prompts, what to look for in the responses, and how to build the process into your existing pipeline.

Why Resumes Fail to Predict Remote Support Performance

MSP hiring process

A resume tells you where someone worked and what certifications they hold. It doesn’t tell you how they explain a ticket to a frustrated client, or whether they can walk someone through a fix without losing patience. Certifications get someone in the door, but they say nothing about the person behind them.

Plenty of candidates carry a stack of certifications and still struggle to hold a plain conversation with a client. That gap catches MSPs off guard more often than you’d expect. A certification proves someone studied the material; it says nothing about whether they can explain a fix without jargon.

Phone screens eat up hours that most MSP owners don’t have to spare. Worse, a candidate can coast through a short call with a few rehearsed answers and sound fine, even when their day-to-day communication falls apart under pressure. That’s the real cost of relying on a quick call to judge someone’s fit for the MSP hiring process.

There’s no room for slow explanations or confused pauses in remote work. A client on the phone wants an answer now, they don’t want to listen to a technician thinking out loud. What the resume can’t answer is whether they can retrieve it under time pressure and translate it into language a non-technical client can act on. Those are two different skills, and neither one of them shows up on a certifications page.

Building the Two-Minute Video Prompt

one-way video interview

Start with one technical question that forces a candidate to explain something in their own words. Skip anything that can be answered with a memorized definition. You want to hear how they break down a concept for someone who isn’t technical, since that’s exactly what the job demands every single day.

Add a scenario prompt built around a frustrated customer or a stalled ticket. This is where a one-way video interview earns its keep, because you get to watch how someone handles pressure without the awkwardness of a live call shaping their answer. The response tells you more about temperament than any resume line ever could.

A short self-introduction rounds things out. Give candidates thirty seconds to talk about themselves, their background, or why they want the role. It’s a small ask, but it reveals tone, energy, and whether someone can speak comfortably on camera, which matters more than people assume for remote support work.

Important thing to note: Video submissions filter out some strong candidates for reasons that have nothing to do with their ability to do the job. These involve poor internet, no quiet space to record, anxiety on camera, or the various cognitive differences that show up disproportionately in strong technical hires (see our piece on why so many of your best MSP techs are neurodivergent). A short line in your submission instructions offering an alternative (e.g., ‘if a video format doesn’t work for you, contact us to arrange another screening method’) costs you nothing and keeps you from filtering out candidates you’d actually want to hire.

Resist the urge to pile on more questions. Three prompts, maybe four at most, keep candidates focused and keep your review time manageable. The most common failure with video screening is asking too many questions, which turns a two-minute screen into a twelve-minute audition. Candidates start rambling because they have too much space to fill, and you end up with less signal. The point is to set constraints beforehand.

What to Listen for in Candidate Responses

screen candidates before interview

Listen for how quickly a candidate gets to the point. A clear answer within a tight time limit shows they can think on their feet, which matters when a client is waiting on the other end of a support call. Rambling under a two-minute cap is a warning sign.

Pay attention to tone when a candidate talks through a frustrating scenario. Someone who stays calm and patient while describing a difficult client interaction will likely bring that same steadiness to real calls. Someone who sounds irritated even in a low-stakes recording probably won’t handle live pressure any better.

Confidence matters, but so does knowing the difference between confidence and overreach. A candidate who admits the limits of their knowledge while still sounding capable is often a safer bet than one who claims to know everything. This ties directly into why KPIs matter once someone actually starts working tickets, since overconfidence tends to show up in error rates later.

Filler words, long pauses, and nervous laughter aren’t disqualifying on their own, but a pattern of them across every answer is worth flagging. Building this kind of review into how you screen candidates before interview scheduling gives you a much clearer read on communication habits than a resume bullet point ever will. Consistently applying it across a growing team is another matter — most MSPs discover that hiring discipline that works for one role stops scaling by the fifth. For MSPs who’ve hit that ceiling and want to see how a support operation is built around consistent hiring at scale, read more on our site.

Besides knowing what to listen for, it’s equally important to be deliberate about which things you should ignore. Your candidate’s accent, appearance, home background, and camera quality have nothing to do with their skills in solving tickets or talking a client through a fix. Those signals leak into evaluations if you’re not watching for them, and they’ll consistently disadvantage strong candidates who don’t happen to record from a quiet office with good lighting. The answer is the only thing to be judged here.

Setting Up the Submission and Review Workflow

Screening candidates by video

Pick a recording tool candidates already know. A phone camera or a basic web app works fine, since the goal is to remove friction, not test someone’s tech setup. Making candidates jump through hoops just to submit a video defeats the purpose before you even watch the first one.

Set a firm two-minute cap and stick to it. A hard limit forces candidates to prioritize what actually matters in their answer, and it keeps your review time short too. Long-winded submissions usually signal the same rambling you’d hear on an actual support call, so the limit does double duty.

Build a scoring rubric before you watch a single video, not after. Deciding what counts as a strong or weak answer ahead of time keeps your judgment consistent across candidates, instead of drifting based on who you watched first. It also speeds up the whole review since you’re not second-guessing yourself.

Batch your reviews into single sittings instead of spreading them across a week. Watching ten videos back-to-back keeps your standards steady, and it plays directly into efforts to reduce time to hire across the whole pipeline. With 26% of MSPs reporting they lack enough staff to service more clients and another 22% unable to find skilled staff for new services (ScalePad 2026 MSP Trends Report), shortening the review side of the pipeline is one of the few levers MSP owners actually control.

For MSPs who want to see how structured screening fits into a broader staffing model designed for support work specifically, find out more about the approach behind it.

Wrap Up

Screening candidates by video gives MSPs a faster, clearer way to spot the right hires before a single interview gets booked. A two-minute recording exposes communication habits, technical clarity, and composure under pressure, all things a resume simply can’t show. It costs candidates little time and saves hiring managers far more. Build the prompts thoughtfully, score them consistently, and let the process do the filtering work for you.


Tal @ Support Adventure

Tal Braiman is a growth-focused digital marketer and writer specializing in content that helps MSPs and IT service organizations scale. At Support Adventure, he supports marketing strategy across SEO, website optimization, and campaign planning, with a focus on making complex operational topics clear and actionable. His writing covers remote IT teams, onboarding, communication systems, and leadership practices that improve outcomes for globally distributed support organizations. Tal is a digital nomad who studied Entrepreneurship & Strategy at Toronto Metropolitan University. He has also published thought leadership pieces online, including articles on technology and digital trends.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.