Someone once said that the key to succeeding in any field is for a person to fit a certain psychological profile. Psychological testing for MSP has embraced this idea wholeheartedly, but the problem is that it often goes too far. What starts as an attempt to ensure team fit or predict performance can quickly become the bane of the industry, creating unnecessary barriers between skilled professionals and the companies that need them most.
Personality types, for instance, are already widely regarded as pseudoscience, yet many companies still consider them critical hiring criteria. Instead of evaluating genuine technical skills, experience, or practical problem-solving abilities, hiring managers often end up making decisions based on vague, unscientific labels that reveal little about how someone will actually perform. Worse still, this approach can alienate strong candidates before they ever get to an interview.
Specialist MSP technicians have no shortage of options in a competitive market. If one employer insists on subjecting them to unnecessary and invasive psychological profiling while another simply respects their expertise, it’s easy to guess which one they’ll choose. That’s just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to why psychological testing for MSP isn’t the best of ideas.
No Evidence of Amazing Results From Personality Testing
Companies love to talk about their innovative hiring processes, but you see, they rarely credit their success to psychological testing for MSP. You don’t hear a firm say, “We’re industry leaders because we used Myers-Briggs.” It just doesn’t work that way. Real growth stories talk about training, culture, or excellent recruitment, not which four-letter code someone got on a quiz.
Many great candidates have been overlooked because their personality test scores didn’t align with some ideal profile. Imagine losing out on someone with years of hands-on experience because a test flagged them as too introverted or too assertive. It’s a shortcut that ends up filtering out serious talent instead of finding fair MSP criteria for evaluating them.
According to people behind a renowned outsourced MSP staffing services agency, there are numerous examples of individuals who “failed” these tests only to go on and have remarkable careers elsewhere. The test didn’t change who they were, and another employer got all the benefits. It’s a real problem if your hiring process is pushing away people who might have been your best performers simply because they didn’t match a canned profile.
However, success in MSP has always depended on more meaningful factors, such as training, experience, and cultural fit. You can’t substitute a genuine conversation or technical test with a multiple-choice personality assessment and expect the same results. That approach just sets you up to miss the point entirely when hiring MSP talent.
The (Pseudo)Science Behind Personality Tests
Personality tests sound scientific at first, but you see, their validity is widely debated. Popular models often reduce complex human behavior to broad categories that don’t hold up under scrutiny. It’s tempting to think you can predict someone’s work style with a few questions, but that’s just wishful thinking packaged as rigor in psychological testing for MSP.
Moreover, these tests oversimplify what makes people effective at their jobs. Two technicians with wildly different personalities can both be excellent in the field. Reducing them to categories like “analytical” or “expressive” ignores the subtle skills and adaptability that matter most when solving real MSP challenges.
There’s no consistent, objective way to measure these supposed traits. Results can shift based on mood, context, or how someone reads the questions. It creates a false sense of certainty for hiring managers who think they’re being data-driven while they’re really making subjective calls with a fancy quiz.
Leaning on these tools can lead companies to make hiring decisions they wouldn’t justify if they really understood the limits. It’s not about adding rigor—it’s about feeling in control. And in MSP, you need genuine insight into skills and mindset, not generic labels that pretend to be fair MSP criteria.
Punishing Candidates for “Gaming” the Test
Employers sometimes reject people for trying to “game” the test, but you see, this is precisely the kind of thinking you want in MSP technicians. These roles thrive on problem-solving and strategy. Penalizing someone for wanting to show themselves in the best light can undermine the very qualities you need.
Specialists from a prestigious MSP staffing agency claim that candidates are aware of the stakes when taking these assessments. Of course, they want to look good—who wouldn’t? Calling this dishonesty ignores the fact that you’re essentially testing them on their ability to read the situation. MSP pros do this every day with clients, finding clever ways to work through challenging problems.
Also, it’s strange to say you want someone who’s excellent at problem-solving but gets upset when they approach your screening like a problem to solve. If testing for MSP applicants can be “gamed,” maybe the issue isn’t the candidate at all. It’s the test itself that doesn’t hold up to real-world scrutiny.
The better approach is to embrace that strategic mindset. Talk to candidates about their work, see how they think, and present them with real-world scenarios. If they’re clever enough to “game” your test, they might just be exactly who you want tackling tough client requests and keeping systems running smoothly.
Impact on Applicant Experience and Perceived Fairness
When you add another layer of assessment, especially something as abstract as a personality quiz, you see, it can make applicants feel like they’re being put through unnecessary hoops. In-demand MSP technicians don’t have to settle for employers who don’t respect their time or skill.
These abstract questions often feel entirely disconnected from the work they’re expected to do. Asking theoretical preferences instead of real-world troubleshooting scenarios sends the message that you don’t understand the role. That’s not how you win over top talent when hiring MSP talent.
Additionally, treating applicants in this manner can deter precisely the individuals you’re trying to hire. When someone has options, they’ll naturally choose the employer who respects their expertise and doesn’t make them feel like a number. A rigid, impersonal process suggests the rest of the company operates the same way.
This approach damages your reputation in a tight labor market. Word spreads when a company makes people feel like cogs in a machine. If you want to be the employer of choice, focus on creating a process that’s human, relevant, and built on fair MSP criteria from the very start.
Better Criteria for MSP hiring and Testing Candidates
Instead of personality quizzes, you see, companies should focus on actual technical assessments. Give candidates scenarios they might face on the job and see how they approach them. It’s the most effective way to know if they can do the work while respecting them as professionals in psychological testing for MSP alternatives.
Moreover, experience and certifications should carry real weight. A candidate who’s navigated difficult MSP situations has invaluable knowledge. You want someone who’s handled weird edge cases, solved them under pressure, and learned lessons you can’t just teach in a classroom.
Don’t underestimate the importance of cultural and team fit—approach it like a genuine conversation. Discuss values, expectations, and work style directly. You don’t need to slot someone into a predefined box from a test to figure out if they’ll fit with your team and support your clients effectively.
The best way to evaluate problem-solving is to observe it in action. Discuss past challenges, assign real tasks, and observe their approach. That’s testing for MSP applicants done right—it respects their expertise and gives you a clear view of whether they’ll be an asset to your team.
Wrap Up On Psychological Testing for MSP Staff
Psychological testing for MSP might seem like a modern, data-driven approach, but it often creates more problems than it solves. Instead of filtering out great talent with abstract quizzes, focus on real skills, practical experience, and meaningful conversations. That’s how you’ll find the technicians who can truly deliver for your clients.
0 Comments